Photo Credit: Lon Levin |
technophobic teacher
The benefits to incorporating technology seem to outweigh the current arguments against the concept. From personalizing education for specific students with high needs (extending curriculum or condensing), to the increased availability to teach through inquiry based methods, into blending or flipping your classroom to support the varied needs of time management for the every busy student.
Photo Credit: 2013 PBS LearningMedia |
Photo Credit: 2013 PBS LearningMedia |
How to integrate technology is a topic of discussion we have had in many of our ed tech classes recently. We know that different divisions have varying policies on what devices are to be in schools. Within my division we are allotted 1 tablet for every 3 students in grades 1-4 and then 1 laptop for every 5 students from grades 5-8. The message we have received for the reasoning behind not being able to purchase more tech for individual buildings is based on the financial upkeep and the workload to keep all the tech running at a working capacity. Through studies my division has determined that through strategic planning every student can access the technology enough that the schools should not need more technology. This is where most of us (actual classroom teachers, shake our heads at the utopia dream world most of the decision makers live in).
BYOD is a concept that my division is creating a policy on and as going to expect their schools to adopt. How it is rolled out and how the communities will accept it only time will tell, but I am hoping that with the board approved policy it gives the schools a little more substance to stand on when we ask our parents to support sending private technology to school for their children to use. One of the policies I have read through and feel is substantial in how they plan on dealing with BYOD issues is from Alberta.
Another concept I found interesting and could very well combat the cost issues with our division is a Parent Owned Device Program. With this concept the parents purchase a device and the school division would upload all the software needed to connect with the schools servers, and the students can access all the necessary digital needs, while off setting the cost based on the devices being owned by the families. While this is from a private school, I feel the concept is worth looking into. There will certainly be the conversation about have and have not schools, but similar to our new public MRI policies in Saskatchewan I'm sure we could adopt something similar in the public education system.
Throughout my research I am finding that everything to do with technology is a balancing act. From how much screen time a student is exposed to, or how effectively the students are retaining the information they are learning. We need to be sure that what we are planning for our students is productive and appropriate.
“One-to-one and BYOD are game changers, giving students access to digital tools throughout the day, across all subject areas. This paradigm shift challenges teachers to rethink and redesign learning activities to capitalize on their school’s investment in technology. ISTEThis puts more pressure on the teacher to develop the appropriate content for each grade/subject level. This brings me back to the point I made earlier in the course about teachers and technology, whether it is 1:1 or BYOD that neither are legislated or mandated to have to be including this concept into the classroom. While I feel technology is very important, I need to understand that colleagues around me may not have the same passion or belief. The goal to education needs to be improving the students, based on curriculum first, and if you have the time, energy, or motivation then you can add in the extras such as technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment